Key result
Cilostazol linked to ~10 bpm higher pulse rate, driving frequent discontinuations for tachycardia.
Why the study?
Cilostazol is effective for secondary prevention of lacunar infarcts but its adverse effects such as palpitation and tachycardia require investigation due to higher incidence than previously reported.
Observational (n=68)
No
May warrant heart rate monitoring or alternative agents in lacunar infarct prevention; leaves open cilostazol's overall safety and utility in this population.
Cilostazol is the first antiplatelet agent to have evidence of efficacy in the secondary prevention of lacunar infarcts.However,since some patients develop palpitation and tachycardia after having taken cilostazol,we decided to investigate the occurrence of these adverse effects.We found that cilostazol significantly increased pulse rate as compared with before administration in 65.3% of patients and the rate for palpitation was 12.2% and that for tachycardia 24.5%.The incidences of these adverse effects were greater than those reported in the clinical trial on cilostazol.Also,28.6% of patients had discontinued cilostazol due to adverse effects such as palpitation,tachycardia,headache,brain infarction relapse,and decreased blood pressure.As the rates for adverse effects of cilostazol were higher than those stated in past package inserts,it is necessary to monitor patients for their appearance.We must also provide them with up-to-date information on the adverse effects that could appear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
FUNAHARA et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Lacunar infarcts (Secondary prevention) (n=68). Cilostazol vs. Before administration (Pre-post comparison) was evaluated on Mean pulse rate (p=<0.01). Cilostazol significantly increased mean pulse rate from 68.4 to 78.3 in patients treated for secondary prevention of lacunar infarcts, with 30.9% discontinuing the drug due to adverse effects like palpitation and tachycardia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: