Key result
Renal sympathetic denervation proves feasible in a previously stented renal artery for resistant hypertension.
Why the study?
Patients with resistant hypertension and prior renal artery stenting were excluded from major RDN trials, resulting in limited data on RDN efficacy in this population.
Case Report (n=1)
Renal denervation may lower BP more than pharmacotherapy in resistant hypertension; supports randomized trials before practice change.
Despite the development of numerous antihypertensive medications and the use of multidrug therapy, about 5% to 20% of all hypertensive patients are resistant to medical therapy. Sympathetic overdrive is responsible for the development and maintenance of resistant hypertension (RH). In the kidney, efferent sympathetic activity promotes Na+ re-absorption and renin release, while afferent nerves stimulate central sympathetic outflow and produce vasoconstriction. The physiological basis of renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) is the suppression of the hyperadrenergic state by the interruption of the renal sympathetic nerve fibers. Two trials Symplicity HTN-1 and Symplicity HTN-2—have demonstrated the efficacy and the safety of RDN in patients with RH. In these trials, patients with renal artery stenosis or stent were excluded; therefore, there are few data about RDN in these patients. Moreover, a meta-analysis did not find an improvement in blood pressure (BP) in patients with renal artery stenosis treated with renal artery stenting.[4] Therefore, a double mechanism maintains hypertension: renovascular and sympathetic tone. In the following, we report the case of a patient with RH treated by RDN after renal artery stenting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berra et al. (2014) conducted a case report in Resistant hypertension (n=1). Renal sympathetic denervation was evaluated. Renal sympathetic denervation was performed in a single patient with resistant hypertension in a previously stented renal artery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: