Key result
Aggressive medical management improves 60-day survival by ~34 percentage points vs conservative therapy.
Why the study?
A clinically relevant, stable, and reproducible large animal chronic heart failure model with improved survival rates was lacking for development of mechanical circulatory support devices.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Optimizes bovine chronic HF model for device testing; leaves open clinical translation from retrospective animal data.
A major limitation in the development of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices has been the lack of a clinically relevant, stable, and reproducible large animal chronic heart failure (HF) model. High mortality rates have been reported with large animal chronic HF models. In this study, methods of medical management to improve survival rate (SR) were investigated. Chronic ischemic HF (IHF) was induced in Jersey calves using a microembolization technique via fluoroscopy-guided injection of 90 μm microspheres into the coronary vasculature. Animals were divided into 1) Control--multiple embolization procedures with conservative therapy (n = 9); 2) treatment group 1 (TG1)--single embolization procedure with moderately aggressive therapy (n = 8); and 3) TG2--single embolization procedure with aggressive medical management (n = 20). The groups were not randomized with data analyzed retrospectively. Mean SR, body condition score, body weight, hemodynamic, echocardiography, and histopathology indices were recorded up to 60 days postembolization. SR improved from 56% (Control) to 75% (TG1) and 90% (TG2) using an aggressive medical management regimen of analgesia, diuretics, beta-blockade, antiarrhythmics, vasodilators, and inotropes. These findings support the hypothesis that a single coronary microembolization procedure and aggressive medical therapy produces a clinically relevant chronic IHF model with a significantly higher SR than conservative medical therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sherwood et al. (2013) studied Chronic ischemic heart failure (n=37). Aggressive medical management vs. Conservative therapy was evaluated on Survival rate. Aggressive medical management increased the 60-day survival rate to 90%, compared with 56% for conservative therapy, in a bovine model of chronic ischemic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: