Key result
Metoprolol reduces hyperaemic calf blood flow ~17% below placebo in claudication patients.
Why the study?
The chronic effects of metoprolol and methyldopa on calf blood flow in hypertensive patients with intermittent claudication were unclear.
RCT (n=14)
Double-blind
Effect estimate: 17% reduction with metoprolol and 12% reduction with methyldopa below placebo levels
p-value: p=<0.05
Supports metoprolol or methyldopa in hypertensive claudicants without perfusion risk; extends RCT safety data on limb hemodynamics.
In a placebo-controlled double-blind study 14 hypertensive patients with intermittent claudication were treated with metoprolol (100-200 mg daily) and methyldopa (500-1000 mg daily) for 3 weeks and their effects on heart rate, blood pressure as well as on resting and hyperaemic calf blood flow and vascular resistance were compared. In their antihypertensive effect metoprolol and methyldopa did not differ significantly. In 23 diseased limbs the calf blood flow and vascular resistance remained unchanged at rest during the trial. The active drugs reduced hyperaemic flow (P less than 0.05). The peak flow was reduced by 20% (P greater than 0.01) with metoprolol and by 15% with methyldopa below the initial level and by 17% and by 12% below the level recorded on placebo, respectively. Neither of the drugs influenced vascular resistance during reactive hyperaemia. Thus, in patients with intermittent claudication antihypertensives should be used with care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mauri Lepäntalo (1984) conducted an RCT in Hypertension with intermittent claudication (n=14). Metoprolol and Methyldopa vs. Placebo was evaluated on Hyperaemic calf blood flow (17% reduction with metoprolol and 12% reduction with methyldopa below placebo levels, p=<0.05). Metoprolol and methyldopa significantly reduced hyperaemic calf blood flow by 17% and 12% below placebo levels (P<0.05) in hypertensive patients with intermittent claudication.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: