Key result
Cardio-ankle vascular index outperforms hs-CRP and Hcy for subclinical arteriosclerosis screening with ~0.71 AUC.
Why the study?
The ability of CAVI, hs-CRP, and homocysteine levels to screen for subclinical arteriosclerosis in an apparently healthy population was unclear.
Cross-Sectional (n=152)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CAVI may aid subAs screening in healthy adults; leaves open whether combined profiles improve detection in prospective studies.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels and homocysteine (Hcy) levels to screen for subclinical arteriosclerosis (subAs) in an apparently healthy population, with the view to obtaining an optimal diagnostic marker or profile for subAs. METHODS: Subjects (152) undergoing routine health examinations were recruited and divided into two groups: carotid arteriosclerosis (CA) and non-carotid arteriosclerosis (NCA), according to carotid intima-media thickness (CMIT). CAVI was calculated based on blood pressure and pulse wave velocity. Serum hs-CRP and Hcy levels were also measured. A Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate the efficacy of each in carotid arteriosclerosis screening. Ten parameter combinations, designated W1 to W10, were compared in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: The levels of all three parameters were significantly higher in the CA group, compared with the NCA group. ROC curves showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for CAVI was 0.708 (95%CI: 0.615-0.800), which is significantly larger than that of either hs-CRP (0.622) or Hcy (0.630), respectively (P < 0.001). Maximum sensitivity (100%) and NPV (100%) were attained with W10, while maximum specificity (86.2%) and PPV (46.7%) were obtained with W7. With W9, the maximum Youden index (0.416) was obtained, with a sensitivity of 77.8% and specificity of 63.8%. CONCLUSIONS: CAVI is more effective than hs-CRP or Hcy for subAs screening. The optimal profile was obtained with a combination of CAVI and other parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhong et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Subclinical arteriosclerosis (n=152). Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) vs. hs-CRP and Hcy was evaluated on Area under the curve (AUC) for carotid arteriosclerosis screening (AUC 0.708, 95% CI 0.615-0.800, p=< 0.001). The cardio-ankle vascular index (AUC 0.708; 95% CI 0.615-0.800) was significantly more effective than hs-CRP or Hcy for subclinical arteriosclerosis screening (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: