Key result
Poor GDMT adherence is linked to ~54% higher risk of death and ventricular arrhythmias.
Why the study?
Poor adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy in HFrEF is linked to mortality and hospitalization, but its association with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias remains unclear.
Does poor adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy increase the risk of all-cause mortality and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in HFrEF patients with primary prevention ICD/CRT-D compared to optimal adherence?
Cohort (n=3,780)
Yes
Does poor adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy increase the risk of all-cause mortality and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in HFrEF patients with primary prevention ICD/CRT-D compared to optimal adherence?
Hazard Ratio: 1.54 (95% CI 1.31–1.82)
In patients with HFrEF who have received ICD/CRT-D devices for primary prevention, maintaining optimal adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy remains crucial as poor adherence is independently associated with significantly increased mortality.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Poor adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) correlates with increased risks of mortality and hospitalization. Whether it is associated with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (VA) remains unclear. We assessed GDMT adherence levels and clinical outcomes in patients with HFrEF. METHODS: Using the National Health Insurance Service database, patients who underwent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator implantation between 2008 to 2020 for primary prevention were included. Those with sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation/flutter, or aborted sudden cardiac death were excluded. Adherence to renin-angiotensin system blockers (RASB), beta blockers (BB), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) was assessed using the weighted proportion of days covered method. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and life-threatening VA. RESULTS: Among 3,780 patients, prescription rates were 87.5% for RASB, 89.7% for BB, and 74.2% for MRA. Poor adherence was associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-1.82) and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.52-2.20) compared with optimal adherence. These associations were more pronounced in ischemic heart failure (HF). Although crude VA event rates were numerically higher with lower adherence, these associations were insignificant after covariate adjustment, regardless of HF etiology. CONCLUSIONS: Lower GDMT adherence was independently associated with increased mortality despite device therapy, particularly in ischemic HF. Although its relationship with arrhythmic outcomes was unclear, sustained adherence remains important and supports targeted interventions to enhance treatment continuity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=3,780). Poor adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) vs. Optimal adherence was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.31-1.82). Poor adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (HR 1.54; 95% CI 1.31-1.82).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: