Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a well-established sustainability standard, yet its application is hindered by extensive data requirements and time-intensive inventory modeling. Machine Learning (ML) can accelerate impact prediction, but current LCA-ML integrations struggle with the structural heterogeneity of multi-source datasets. This study develops and validates a high-throughput decision-support pipeline that harmonizes 1219 compiled datasets from three LCA databases (Agribalyse, ecoinvent, and Agri-footprint) into 913 training samples and predicts 11 midpoint impact categories. Thirteen ML algorithms were compared under repeated stratified cross-validation. Gradient Boosting architectures (CatBoost, XGBoost, and GBM) consistently outperformed the remaining models, frequently achieving coefficients of determination (R 2 ) above 0.80, and tolerated aggressive dimensionality reduction, maintaining an average normalized root mean square error of 3.5% after the input space was compressed from 169 to 14 easily accessible agronomic variables. Feature importance based on SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) identified land-use dynamics, energy supply chains, animal manure and nutrient management as primary impact vectors, and crop-specific analyses indicated that dataset homogeneity outweighs raw sample volume; both are reported in Section S4 of the Supplementary information. Freshwater Ecotoxicity, Human Toxicity and Photochemical Oxidant Formation remained the least predictable categories, with R 2 below 0.60 in every version of the integrated dataset — a limitation traced to database-specific methodological variability in system boundaries, geographical scope and allocation rules. Deep structural pre-harmonization, functional units beyond pure mass, and parameterized LCA datasets are therefore research priorities. By delivering a parsimonious 14-variable model, the framework bypasses exhaustive supply-chain mapping and supports rapid, sustainability-driven decisions; its outputs are probabilistic estimates, since uncertainty propagation is not yet quantified within the pipeline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salla et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: