Through-water photogrammetry based on UAV imagery enables shallow-water bathymetry, but refraction at the air–water interface violates the straight-ray assumption of Structure-from-Motion and causes systematic depth bias. We present BathyFacto, a refraction-aware two-media extension of Nerfacto integrated into Nerfstudio that targets metrically consistent underwater point clouds on simulated data. BathyFacto uses a shared hash-grid-based density field with a medium-conditioned color head that receives a one-bit medium flag (air or water) and traces each camera ray as two segments: a straight segment in air up to a planar water surface and a refracted segment in water computed via Snell’s law with known refractive indices. To allocate samples efficiently across the air–water boundary, we employ a single proposal-network sampler that operates on a virtual straight ray spanning both media, combined with a kinked density wrapper that transparently corrects water-segment positions along the refracted direction before density evaluation. A data adaptation pipeline converts photogrammetric reconstructions to a Nerfstudio-compatible format, estimates the water plane from boundary markers, and provides per-pixel medium masks to gate refraction. We also extend the point cloud export with refraction-corrected backprojection and reversible coordinate transforms to world and global frames. On a simulated two-media scene with known ground truth, the refraction-aware BathyFacto achieves a Cloud-to-Mesh signed median deviation of −0.001 m and 85.7% completeness at 0.2 m tolerance, measured in the absolute global coordinate frame without any rigid-body alignment, compared to +1.370 m/11.6% for the single-medium Nerfacto baseline and +1.409 m/9.9% for BathyFacto without consideration of refraction. Even after a naive refractive-index depth correction, these baselines remain offset by ≈ 0.4 m. In contrast to a refraction-corrected Multi-View Stereo reference, which is reliable only for near-nadir viewing geometry, BathyFacto recovers consistent geometry across the full range of camera incidence angles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brezovsky et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: