Why the study?
The precise molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying pioglitazone-induced heart failure remain incompletely understood despite known clinical risks of fluid retention and heart failure exacerbation.
The primary clinical mechanism for pioglitazone-induced heart failure is volume overload from renal fluid retention and vascular changes, supporting clinical strategies like pre-treatment screening and co-administration with SGLT2 inhibitors or amiloride in low-risk patients.
Pioglitazone is thought to increase the risk of heart failure exacerbation in vulnerable individuals, primarily through fluid retention and plasma volume expansion. However, the precise molecular and cellular mechanisms remain incompletely understood. This narrative review aims to collect, organise, and evaluate current evidence on the pathophysiological mechanisms driving pioglitazone-related heart failure. We categorised preclinical and clinical data into key pathophysiological domains and graded evidence strength as high, moderate, or limited. The key domains implicated in this process include renal fluid retention, direct myocardial effects, altered energy metabolism, vascular changes, neurohormonal activation, and individual genetic susceptibility. While fluid retention and vascular changes demonstrate strong clinical evidence, direct myocardial toxicity remains primarily observed in vitro and lacks clinical confirmation. Neurohormonal activation and metabolic disturbances are supported by moderate evidence from animal models and cohort studies, whereas evidence for genetic susceptibility and direct cardiotoxicity remains limited. Overall, this review grades the strength of current evidence and provides a framework for the safe clinical use of pioglitazone and the design of targeted risk prevention strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) conducted a review in Pioglitazone-induced heart failure. Pioglitazone was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: