Key result
Tricuspid valve replacement linked to ~10-fold higher all-cause mortality compared with tricuspid repair.
Why the study?
Isolated tricuspid valve repair or replacement is performed relatively rarely, and long-term mortality and readmission rates after these surgeries are not well characterized.
Cohort (n=197)
No
Absolute Event Rate: 32.6% vs 3.3%
p-value: p=<0.001
May favor repair when feasible in tricuspid surgery; leaves open whether mortality difference is causal or confounded.
BACKGROUND: Given that isolated tricuspid valve (TV) repair or replacement is performed relatively rarely, we sought to evaluate the rate of long-term mortality and readmission following this surgery. METHODS: The current study was conducted in Tehran Heart Center on patients who underwent isolated TV repair or replacement between 2010 and 2018. Totally, 197 patients (repair = 150 vs replacement = 47) were included in our study and were then followed right after surgery for a median of 8 years to assess the incidence of postoperative events, readmission, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The final analysis was conducted on 197 patients at a mean age of 44.4 ± 13.8 years. Most of the patients were female (56.9%). Ejection fraction, TAPSE, and right ventricular function improved in both groups after TV surgery. Length of stay in the intensive care unit per hour and hospitalization per day were higher in the replacement group and compared to the repair group (158.34 vs. 55.11 and 18.21 vs. 9.34, respectively). In-hospital mortality occurred in 20 patients, of whom 15 had TV replacement. Readmission occurred in five (2.5%) patients,all were in the repair group. CONCLUSIONS: The result of this single-center study showed that TV replacement is associated with a higher rate of postoperative events and all-cause mortality compared to TV repair. Whereas, repair group had a higher rate of readmission. Therefore, the overwhelming tendency is toward repair; nonetheless, no hesitation is permissible if a replacement is adjudged to confer a better outcome for the patient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tafti et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Isolated tricuspid valve disease (n=197). Tricuspid valve replacement vs. Tricuspid valve repair was evaluated on All-cause mortality (p=<0.001). Tricuspid valve replacement was associated with a significantly higher rate of all-cause mortality compared to tricuspid valve repair (32.6% vs 3.3%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: