Key result
Maintaining ≥100 weekly PAI is linked to attenuated cardiovascular risk factor clustering from sedentary behavior.
Why the study?
Prolonged sedentary behavior is positively associated with clustering of cardiovascular disease risk factors, and the modifying effect of Personal Activity Intelligence on this association is unclear.
Cohort (n=29,950)
May inform sedentary behavior counseling; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Prolonged sedentary behavior (SB) positively associates with clustering of risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). The recently developed metric for physical activity (PA) tracking called Personal Activity Intelligence (PAI) takes into account age, sex, resting and maximum heart rate, and a score of ≥100 weekly PAI has been shown to reduce the risk of premature CVD death in healthy as well as individuals with known CVD risk factors, regardless of whether or not the current PA recommendations were met. The aim of the present study was to examine if PAI modifies the associations between SB and CVD risk factor (CV-RF) clustering in a large apparently healthy general population cohort (n=29,950, aged ≥20 years). Logistic regression revealed that in those with ≥100 weekly PAI, the likelihood of CV-RF clustering prevalence associated with prolonged SB was attenuated across age groups. Monitoring weekly PAI-level could be useful to ensure that people perform enough PA to combat SB's deleterious association with CV-RF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zisko et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Healthy general population (n=29,950). Personal Activity Intelligence (PAI) score ≥100 weekly vs. PAI score <100 weekly was evaluated on Cardiovascular risk factor (CV-RF) clustering prevalence. Maintaining ≥100 weekly Personal Activity Intelligence (PAI) attenuated the likelihood of cardiovascular risk factor clustering associated with prolonged sedentary behavior in 29,950 healthy adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: