Key result
Telephone training fails to improve ECG quality over no training as quality improves naturally.
Why the study?
Self-recorded single-lead ECGs used for arrhythmia diagnosis can be of variable quality, affecting interpretation reliability, and the impact of telephone training on ECG quality is unclear.
Does telephone training improve ECG quality in older adults undergoing remote ECG screening for atrial fibrillation who record a high proportion of initial poor-quality ECGs?
Observational (n=13,741)
Yes
Does telephone training improve ECG quality in older adults undergoing remote ECG screening for atrial fibrillation who record a high proportion of initial poor-quality ECGs?
For older adults conducting remote single-lead ECG screening for atrial fibrillation, ECG quality improves naturally over time, and telephone training for those with initially poor-quality traces does not provide a significant incremental benefit.
Telephone training offers no added benefit for remote ECG quality; leaves open whether other strategies enhance unsupervised AF screening recordings.
Objective. Self-recorded, single-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) are increasingly used to diagnose arrhythmias. However, they can be of variable quality, affecting the reliability of interpretation. In this analysis of ECGs collected in atrial fibrillation screening studies, our aims were to: (i) determine the quality of ECGs when recorded unsupervised; and (ii) investigate whether telephone training improved ECG quality. Approach. Data was obtained from the Screening for Atrial Fibrillation with ECG to Reduce stroke programme, where participants recorded four single-lead ECG traces per day for three weeks using a handheld device. ECG quality was assessed by an automated algorithm, and participants who recorded >25% poor-quality ECGs from days 4–10 of screening were identified for training to improve ECG recording technique. Training was delivered when research team capacity permitted. Main results. 13 741 participants recorded 1127 264 ECGs, of which 41 288 (3.7%) were poor-quality. Most participants (51.5%) did not record any poor-quality ECGs. 1,088 (7.9%) participants met the threshold for training. Of these, 165 participants received training and 923 did not. The median proportion of poor-quality ECGs per participant on days 1–3 was 41.7 (27.3–50.0)% for those who received training and 33.3 (25.0–45.5)% for those who did not. On days 11–21, the median proportions of poor-quality ECGs per participant were significantly lower (p < 0.001) for those who received training, 17.8 (5.0–31.6)%, and those who did not, 14.0 (4.8–30.2)%. Comparing these groups, the mean (95% confidence interval) reduction in proportion of poor-quality ECGs from days 1–3 to days 11–21 was 20.2 (16.8–23.5)% in those who received training and 16.0 (14.7–17.3)% in those who did not (p = 0.396). Significance. Most participants achieved adequate quality ECGs. For those that did not, ECG quality improved over time regardless of whether they received telephone training. Telephone training may therefore not be required to achieve improvements in ECG quality during screening.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhayankaram et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Atrial Fibrillation (n=13,741). Telephone training for ECG recording technique vs. No telephone training was evaluated on Reduction in the proportion of poor-quality ECGs from days 1–3 to days 11–21 (p=0.396). Telephone training did not significantly improve ECG quality compared to no training, with a mean reduction in poor-quality ECGs of 20.2% versus 16.0% (p=0.396), as quality naturally improved over time.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: