Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This mixed-methods study tested whether reciprocal storytelling can foster empathy across lines of difference in a college setting. A total of 118 undergraduate students were randomly assigned to either an Open Book or a control group condition. In the Open Book condition, reciprocal storytelling was operationalized through three core components: first-person narrative sharing, facilitated reciprocal dialogue using reflective prompts, and voluntary participation emphasizing psychological safety. Control sessions followed a lecture-style storytelling format. Empathy was measured using the Interpersonal and Social Empathy Index at three time points. A linear mixed-effects model revealed that while both groups showed increases in empathy over time, the Open Book group exhibited more immediate gains that were sustained at follow-up. Qualitative analysis supported these findings: participants in the Open Book condition described emotionally resonant moments, reflected on social identity differences, and reported ongoing shifts in self-understanding. Together, the results suggest that reciprocal storytelling may cultivate empathy through dialogic engagement and deepen perspective-taking in ways distinct from traditional, one-way lecture storytelling formats. Open Book represents a structured implementation of reciprocal storytelling for cultivating empathy, inclusion, and meaningful intergroup engagement in classrooms and campus communities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kapur et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: