This study examines the value relevance of accounting fundamentals, social and governance performance, and innovation-related disclosures for non-financial European firms. Building on the Ohlson (1995) framework, the analysis combines panel-data econometrics with Random Forest machine learning to evaluate both inferential and predictive dimensions of value relevance. We find that non-financial disclosures are not uniformly value relevant. Social-governance performance and environmental innovation exhibit no direct linear association with firm value, while SDG 9 innovation orientation is negatively priced. Environmental innovation, however, emerges as the strongest non-financial predictor in the Random Forest models, revealing predictive content that fixed-effects specifications miss. Value relevance is further conditional on signal interaction: environmental innovation attenuates the valuation effect of social-governance performance, while stronger social-governance performance reduces the negative pricing of SDG 9 disclosure. Overall, our results indicate that disclosure type, signal interaction, and nonlinear predictive structure jointly determine whether sustainability and innovation information is priced by markets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Delegkos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: