Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) possess a diverse vocal repertoire that plays an important role in their social communication, yet automated classification of their vocalizations remains largely unexplored. This study presents a biologically informed multi-task learning framework that jointly classifies zebra finch vocalizations at two hierarchical levels: the call-type level, comprising eleven individual call types, and the semantic level, comprising six broader categories derived from an established perceptual taxonomy. Frozen embeddings from the BirdAVES pre-trained audio transformer are combined with a shared encoder trained under a composite objective integrating call-type cross-entropy, cross-entropy over semantic targets, and Supervised Contrastive Loss. Four experimental configurations are evaluated, comprising two single-task baselines, one for call-type and one for semantic classification, and two multi-task variants differing in their semantic loss weighting strategy. Across the two multi-task configurations, the best call-type performance is achieved by the dynamic weighting variant, reaching 87.11% accuracy and a macro F1-score of 82.76%, while the best semantic performance is achieved by the scheduled weighting variant, reaching 90.55% accuracy and a macro F1-score of 90.74%. Both multi-task configurations outperform their respective single-task baselines. Embedding space analysis reveals an approximately three-fold increase in silhouette score under multi-task learning, suggesting that biologically informed supervision may improve the geometric structure of learned acoustic representations in a manner consistent with the functional organization of the zebra finch vocal repertoire.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Radočaj et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: