Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Most colorectal cancers are diagnosed in patients aged 65 years and older, with nearly 50% developing liver metastases (CRLM). This study explores postoperative and oncologic outcomes in elderly and very elderly patients with CRLM who receive curative-intent treatment. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with CRLM who underwent surgical resection assessed associations with clinical outcomes. Groups were stratified by age at hepatic metastasectomy, defined as adults < 65 years, elderly 65-75 years, and very elderly > 75 years. RESULTS: We identified 346 patients, including 95 (27%) elderly and 38 (11%) very elderly patients. These patients had more medical comorbidities but comparable functional status. Elderly and very elderly patients had more right-sided tumors (p < 0.001), more pN1 disease (p = 0.009), and more often found to have metachronous liver metastases (p < 0.001). Significantly fewer elderly and very elderly patients received systemic treatment (p < 0.001). All groups underwent similar operative management with no differences in 30-day readmission, reoperation, and complication rates. Recurrence-free (p = 0.232) and overall survival (p = 0.418) were similar across groups. Age was not significantly associated with survival on univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Well-selected elderly and very elderly patients can undergo hepatic metastasectomy without increased postoperative morbidity. Despite receiving less systemic treatment, these patients can achieve similar oncologic outcomes to adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: