Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article analyzes local policy evaluation in China through 415 policy documents (2003–2026) and a four-dimensional framework covering institutional impetus, policy domains, evaluation timing, and intended use. Using temporal, content, and thematic analysis, it finds three stages of development: formation, growth, and deepening. Local policy evaluation has moved from scattered experimentation to broader cross-sectoral expansion and fuller policy embedding. The study argues that this evolution has been driven mainly by administrative authorization, hierarchical transmission, and local adaptation. Evaluation often enters governance first as a procedural arrangement, with stronger findings-oriented use developing later. Three challenges remain: a weak localized knowledge system, underdeveloped feedback mechanisms, and an immature evaluation culture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: