This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Purpose This study aims to quantify the effects of die-attach void fraction and in-plane position on heat flow in a high-power phosphor-converted LED package. Design/methodology/approach The model was run in MATLAB R2025b with the Partial Differential Equation Toolbox. Nineteen configurations covered six void fractions and three positions, plus the void-free case. Mesh, energy-balance, transient, material, convection, source-partition, shape and aspect-ratio checks were completed. The 18 voided cases were examined as a 6 × 3 fraction–position grid. Findings The 30% corner-directed void raised junction temperature by 5.50 °C and package resistance by 39.37%. It also made the chip-top field strongly non-uniform. The corner penalty remained 5.39–5.61 °C over the conversion-layer heat sweep. Heat was redirected laterally, and the position penalty grew with void fraction. Practical implications A limit based only on total void area can miss a large defect located near the edge or corner of the bond. Originality/value Moving a void while keeping its projected area unchanged produced different temperature and resistance values. The heat-flux maps relate this position effect to the loss of the direct through-thickness path and increased lateral flow through the remaining bonded area.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Viet-Dung Le (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: