Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypergolic metal–organic frameworks (HMOFs), constructed by coordinating reactive metal centers with energetic ligands, are promising alternatives to carcinogenic, storage-demanding hydrazine fuels. However, the gravimetric energy densities (Eg) of reported HMOFs are generally below 30 kJ g–1. Here, a strategy is proposed to combine hypergolic HMOFs, [M(2-Mim)2(DCA)2]n (2-Mim = 2-methylimidazole, DCA = dicyanamide; M = Co 1, Ni 2), with high-energy yet nonhypergolic paraffin wax (PW), thereby achieving hypergolic materials with high energy density. The corresponding 20 wt % type II grains (type II = grain configuration containing an axial cavity filled with HMOF), 1-20%-PW-II and 2-20%-PW-II, achieved high energy densities of 42.29 and 42.30 kJ g–1, respectively, representing >72% increases over the neat HMOFs. Meanwhile, these composite materials retain reliable ignition and subsequent reignition capability. Compound 1 and its composite fuel both ignite faster than 2 and its corresponding composite. Calculations attribute this difference to the greater electronic responsiveness of the Co coordination node, stronger HNO3 binding, and enhanced charge transfer from 1 to HNO3. This strategy provides a reference for the design and preparation of hypergolic fuels with high energy density and reignition capability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: