Key result
Higher admission eosinophil count linked to ~84% lower risk of malignant brain edema per SD.
Why the study?
The independent associations of admission eosinophil count with malignant brain edema and poor functional outcome after mechanical thrombectomy were unclear, as was the contribution of malignant brain edema to this association.
Does admission eosinophil count predict malignant brain edema and functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy?
Cohort (n=442)
No
Does admission eosinophil count predict malignant brain edema and functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy?
Lower admission eosinophil counts in acute ischemic stroke patients are independently associated with an increased risk of malignant brain edema and poor functional outcome after mechanical thrombectomy.
May inform post-thrombectomy edema risk stratification; leaves open causal role and need for prospective validation.
Objective To examine the independent associations of admission eosinophil count with malignant brain edema (MBE) and with poor 3-month functional outcome after mechanical thrombectomy (MT), and to quantify the statistical contribution of MBE to the eosinophil-outcome association using mediation analysis. Methods A total of 442 consecutive AIS patients who underwent MT between May 2017 and January 2023 were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association of eosinophils with MBE and poor outcome. Mediation analysis was performed to quantify the statistical contribution of MBE. Results MBE developed in 98 (22.17%) patients. After full adjustment for confounders, each 1-standard deviation increase in standardized eosinophils was independently associated with a lower risk of MBE (OR = 0.165; 95% CI: 0.055–0.498; p = 0.00137). Consistent findings were observed when eosinophils were dichotomized by the median value (OR = 0.168; 95% CI: 0.086–0.328; p < 0.00001). Standardized eosinophils were also independently associated with reduced risk of poor outcome (OR = 0.620; 95% CI: 0.475–0.810; p = 0.00045). Mediation analysis showed a small statistical contribution of MBE to the eosinophil-outcome association: the indirect effect was −0.2109 (95% CI: −0.4016 to −0.0500; p < 0.001), and the mediated proportion was 12.05% (95% CI: 2.92–26%). Conclusion Lower admission eosinophil levels were independently associated with higher risks of MBE and poor 3-month functional outcome. Mediation analysis indicated that MBE statistically accounted for 12.05% (95% CI: 2.92–26%) of the eosinophil-outcome association. These findings are hypothesis-generating and require external multicenter validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with mechanical thrombectomy (n=442). Admission eosinophil count vs. Lower vs higher eosinophil counts (or per 1-standard deviation increase) was evaluated on Malignant brain edema (MBE) within 5 days (OR 0.165, 95% CI 0.055-0.498, p=0.00137). Each 1-standard deviation increase in standardized admission eosinophil count was independently associated with a significantly lower risk of malignant brain edema (OR 0.165) after mechanical thrombectomy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: