Key result
Baseline resting heart rate ≥110 bpm linked to ~38% higher adverse event risk in AF.
Why the study?
The impact of resting heart rate on adverse events in paroxysmal versus sustained atrial fibrillation remains unclear.
Cohort (n=2,674)
Yes
Hazard Ratio: 1.38 (95% CI 1.1–1.72)
Absolute Event Rate: 52.4% vs 42.4%
May identify higher-risk sustained AF patients; leaves open whether rate control improves outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Heart rate (HR) is an important factor in atrial fibrillation (AF); however, it remains unclear whether the impact of HR differs between paroxysmal AF and sustained (persistent and permanent) AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: The association of resting HR during AF with adverse events (composite of all-cause death, hospitalization for heart failure, stroke/systemic embolisms, myocardial infarction, and arrhythmic events) in 1,064 paroxysmal and 1,610 sustained AF patients from the Fushimi AF Registry were investigated. These patients were divided into 4 groups based on their resting HR; ≥110 beats/min (bpm), 80-109 bpm, 60-79 bpm, and <60 bpm. The number of patients in each group was 486, 400, 172, and 22 for paroxysmal AF, and 205, 734, 645, and 71 for sustained AF, respectively. Among patients with sustained AF, a HR ≥110 bpm was associated with a higher incidence of adverse events at 1 year and during the entire follow up (median of 1,833 days) (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] compared with a HR of 60-79 bpm: 1.90 [1.31-2.72] at 1 year, 1.38 [1.10-1.72] during the entire follow up). Patients with a HR <60 bpm showed higher incidence of adverse events at 1 year; however, the incidence of adverse events did not differ among all HR groups of paroxysmal AF. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline HR was associated with adverse events in sustained AF, but not in paroxysmal AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2020 study conducted a cohort in Atrial Fibrillation (Paroxysmal and Sustained) (n=2,674). Baseline resting heart rate ≥110 bpm vs. Baseline resting heart rate 60-79 bpm was evaluated on Composite of all-cause death, hospitalization for heart failure, stroke/systemic embolisms, myocardial infarction, and arrhythmic events (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.10-1.72). In patients with sustained atrial fibrillation, a baseline resting heart rate of ≥110 bpm was associated with a significantly higher incidence of adverse events compared to a heart rate of 60-79 bpm (HR 1.38).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: