Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) covers a range of life-limiting illnesses characterized by increased pulmonary arterial pressures leading to right heart failure and death, if untreated. 15-25% of patients have genetic mutations, the most common affecting bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2 ( BMPR2) . The aim was to define an inflammatory cytokine profile in BMPR2 -mutation positive patients and analyze their influence on survival. Methods Levels of cytokines were measured in plasma samples from BMPR2 -mutation positive patients ( BMPR2mut , n=54), patients without any driving mutations (n=54), and healthy controls (n=56) recruited from the United Kingdom cohort. Findings BMPR2- mutation positive patients and patients without mutations had high levels of interleukin-6, interleukin-8, tumor necrosis factor-α, and vascular endothelial growth factor-A compared to controls. Only BMPR2- mutation carrying patients had higher G-CSF levels compared to controls. VEGF-A levels were substantially higher in patients without mutations compared to the BMPR2mut group. Interleukin-6 was a significant discriminator for mortality in the BMPR2mut cohort (cumulative survival with interleukin-6≥1.6pg/ml at 3 years was 65% compared to 96% with interleukin-6<1.6pg/ml, P =0·0013). N-Terminal pro-B-Type natriuretic peptide levels did not discriminate for survival in our BMPR2mut cohort (cumulative survival for patients with an NT-proBNP>130ng/ml at 3 years was 76% compared to 84% for patients with an NT-proBNP≤130ng/ml, P =0·37). NT-proBNP outperformed interleukin-6 in PAH without mutations. Interpretation BMPR2 -mutation positivity has a direct impact not only on inflammatory profiles but also on effectiveness of prognostic biomarkers. In our BMPR2 -mutation positive cohort IL-6 was the strongest prognostic biomarker and NT-proBNP failed to discriminate for survival. Key messages What is the key question? Do pulmonary arterial hypertension patients who are BMPR2-mutation positive have a different cytokine signature than PAH patients without mutations? What is the bottom line? BMPR2-mutation positive and PAH patients without mutations display different patterns of cytokine elevation and these cytokines differ in the way they influence transplant-free survival. Why read on? In our cohort of BMPR2-mutation positive patients, IL-6 is the best prognostic biomarker while NT-proBNP failed to discriminate for survival – this implies that prognostic biomarkers and by inference treatments could be genotype-specific. Graphical Abstract TAKE HOME MESSAGE BMPR2-mutation positive patients have different inflammatory and growth factor profiles compared to PAH patients without mutations. Interleukin-6 is an effective biomarker for transplant-free survival in our cohort of BMPR2 -mutation positive patients while NT-proBNP is ineffective. Conversely, NT-proBNP appears to be a more effective biomarker for pulmonary arterial patients without any mutations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schwiening et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: