Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Why do some experiences endure in memory better than others? Here we explore the possibility that learning fluctuates rhythmically several times per second, with fortuitously timed experiences being more memorable. Although such fleeting opportunities for encoding would evade our awareness, they are predicted by a prominent model describing how theta rhythms in the brain coordinate memory-the Separate Phases for Encoding and Retrieval (SPEAR) model. In a preregistered study, we adapted a dense sampling approach to reconstruct the millisecond time course of memory encoding in n = 125 participants. We found that memory encoding fluctuated at a theta rhythm (3-10 Hz), that these rhythms were not a by-product of rhythmic attention and that-like theta rhythms in the brain-memory rhythms were modulated by putative markers of acetylcholine. Our findings provide behavioural evidence consistent with the SPEAR model of episodic memory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biba et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: