Ideally, datasets for training machine learning models consist of thousands of versatile data samples — a scale that is seldom met in materials research to date. Transfer learning (TL) is widely used to mitigate data scarcity in available training sets by leveraging knowledge from related domains, since models pretrained on auxiliary datasets may learn structure–property relationships that are transferable from one to another. In this work, the potential of TL for predicting the performance of small organic molecule dissolution modulators is probed using corrosion inhibition responses of eleven Mg-based materials taken from the previously published ExCorr database. A significant improvement in prediction accuracy is observed when transfer learning is applied. However, for the dataset configuration studied here, the apparent cross-alloy TL gains are shown not to arise from transferable structure–activity relationship (SAR) knowledge but rather from a learned alloy-context signal embedded in the data. Seven Mg-based materials—six commercial alloys plus the high-purity variant HPMg51—form a shared-SAR cluster with strongly correlated inhibitor rankings, such that molecules labeled on one material are readily predictable for others within the cluster. Within this shared-SAR cluster, extensive overlap reduces the effective training pool from approximately 900 records to only around 180 unique molecules, placing the task firmly in a small-data regime. In this setting, an in-context large language model (Gemini 3.1 Pro) is the only approach that successfully learns meaningful SAR, with its pretrained knowledge providing the transfer that the explicit source dataset fails to deliver.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Busch et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: