Key result
Viral genome persistence shows no link to worse short-term LVEF recovery versus viral clearance.
Why the study?
Viral infections are the most frequent cause of myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy, but the impact of viral genome persistence in myocardium on clinical and echocardiographic outcomes is unclear.
Cohort (n=54)
No
May not warrant antiviral intervention for persistence alone in myocarditis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation.
Introduction: Viral infections are considered the most frequent cause of myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).Material and methods: We investigated the changes in viral presence and the impact of viral genome persistence in the myocardium on echocardiographic parameters, functional status and some laboratory parameters in a 6-month follow-up.Fifty-four patients with recent onset DCM, left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% and biopsy-proven myocarditis (> 14 mononuclear leukocytes/mm 2 and/or > 7 T-lymphocytes/mm 2 ) were enrolled.Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to detect pathogens in the myocardium.Patients were divided according to the administered therapy: standard heart failure medication (46 patients) and immunosuppressive therapy (8 patients).Results: In the standard heart failure medication group viral clearance was observed in 13 patients and viral persistence in 24 patients in the follow-up period.Comparing both groups, there was no statistically significant difference -LVEF improvement of 12.0 ±11.4% vs. 18.3 ±12.6%, decrease in NYHA class of 0.7 ±0.7 vs. 1.0 ±0.7, decline in NT-proBNP of 1335 ±1933 ng/l vs. 1942 ±3242 ng/l and decrease in infiltrating leukocytes of 11.1 ±15.8 vs. 6.7 ±23.0 cells/mm 2 and T-lymphocytes of 5.8 ±15.1 vs. 1.8 ±10.9 cells/mm 2 (all p = NS).A decrease in PCR positive patients from 37 to 29 was observed.The number of PVB19 positive PCR findings decreased from 5 to 4 in patients with immunosuppressive therapy.Conclusions: A decrease in the number of positive PCR findings in control endomyocardial biopsy was observed.Viral genome persistence was not associated with worse outcome in short-term follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mlejnek et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Inflammatory cardiomyopathy (recent onset dilated cardiomyopathy) (n=54). Viral genome persistence vs. Viral genome clearance was evaluated on Improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 6 months (p=0.0822). Viral genome persistence in the myocardium was not associated with worse short-term clinical outcomes compared to viral clearance, demonstrating a similar mean LVEF improvement of 18.3% versus 12.0%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: