Key result
Glibenclamide fails to improve 6-month cognitive scores vs. placebo after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Why the study?
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is associated with high incidence of long-term cognitive impairment, decreased quality of life, and psychiatric disorders, but the effects of glibenclamide on these outcomes are unknown.
Does glibenclamide improve cognitive performance, quality of life, and emotional aspects in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
RCT (n=45)
Randomly allocated
Does glibenclamide improve cognitive performance, quality of life, and emotional aspects in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
Glibenclamide does not appear to improve cognitive or emotional outcomes at 6 months in survivors of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Glibenclamide should not be used to enhance cognition after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage; challenges SUR1 inhibition as a therapeutic approach in this population.
BACKGROUND: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is associated with a high incidence of long-term cognitive impairment, decreased quality of life (QoL), and psychiatric disorders. The effects of glibenclamide on such outcomes in the setting of aSAH are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of glibenclamide in patients with aSAH on cognitive performance, QoL, and emotional aspects. METHODS: Patients identified with aSAH were randomly allocated to receive 5 mg of glibenclamide for 21 days or placebo, starting within 96 hours of the ictus. After 6 months, patients were evaluated with Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (cognitive performance), Medical Outcomes Short-form Health Survey (QoL), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Screen for Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms (emotional aspects). RESULTS: The mean Montreal Cognitive Assessment score was 22.5 ± 6.2. No statistically significant difference was found between groups, with a mean score of 21.7 ± 6.4 in the Glibenclamide group and 23.4 ± 6.2 in the placebo group (P = 0.392). A score <23 was observed in 16 patients (35.6%) and its frequency was similar between groups (P = 0.900). The most frequently impaired domains were Attention (N = 21/45; 46.7%) and Visuospatial (18/45; 40.0%). Impairment of each domain was similar between groups (P > 0.05). In each domain, the mean score was similar between groups (P > 0.05). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores did not differ between groups (P > 0.05). The mean Screen for Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms score as well as the mean scores of its domains were similar between groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Glibenclamide did not improve cognitive performance, QoL, and emotional aspects after 6 months of follow-up of aSAH survivors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Windlin et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) (n=45). Glibenclamide vs. Placebo was evaluated on Montreal Cognitive Assessment score at 6 months (p=0.392). In survivors of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, glibenclamide did not significantly improve Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores at 6 months compared to placebo (21.7 vs 23.4, P = 0.392).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: