Key result
Sonothrombolysis shows no benefit over IV tPA alone for 90-day functional outcomes.
Why the study?
Increasing implementation of endovascular therapies across major academic stroke centers raises challenges for clinical trials testing noninterventional or adjuvant reperfusion strategies such as sonothrombolysis.
RCT (n=624)
Double-blind
1:1 web-based central randomization
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sonothrombolysis does not improve primary 90-day outcomes despite excluding endovascular equipoise shifts; post hoc analysis leaves open secondary signals for prospective testing.
BACKGROUND: Results of our recently published phase III randomized clinical trial of ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis (sonothrombolysis) using an operator-independent, high frequency ultrasound device revealed heterogeneity of patient recruitment among centers. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis after excluding subjects that were recruited at centers reporting a decline in the balance of randomization between sonothrombolysis and concurrent endovascular trials. RESULTS: From a total of 676 participants randomized in the CLOTBUST-ER trial we identified 52 patients from 7 centers with perceived equipoise shift in favor of endovascular treatment. Post hoc sensitivity analysis in the intention-to-treat population adjusted for age, National Institutes of Health Scale score at baseline, time from stroke onset to tPA bolus and baseline serum glucose showed a significant (p < 0.01) interaction of perceived endovascular equipoise shift on the association between sonothrombolysis and 3 month functional outcome [adjusted common odds ratio (cOR) in centers with perceived endovascular equipoise shift: 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.75; p = 0.02; adjusted cOR for centers without endovascular equipoise shift: 1.20, 95% CI 0.89-1.62; p = 0.24)]. After excluding centers with perceived endovascular equipoise shift, patients randomized to sonothrombolysis had higher odds of 3 month functional independence (mRS scores 0-2) compared with patients treated with tPA only (adjusted OR: 1.53; 95% CI 1.01-2.31; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Our experience in CLOTBUST-ER indicates that increasing implementation of endovascular therapies across major academic stroke centers raises significant challenges for clinical trials aiming to test noninterventional or adjuvant reperfusion strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexandrov et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) (n=624). Sonothrombolysis (active high-frequency ultrasound + IV tPA) vs. Sham ultrasound + intravenous tPA was evaluated on Ordinal shift in modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at 90 days (Global outcome) (adjusted cOR 1.20, 95% CI 0.89-1.62, p=0.24). Sonothrombolysis did not improve overall 90-day functional outcomes compared to IV tPA alone after excluding centers with a shift toward endovascular therapy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: