Key result
Off-hour presentation for endovascular stroke treatment shows no difference in 90-day functional outcomes vs on-hour presentation.
Why the study?
The influence of admission time on door-to-groin time and stroke outcome after mechanical thrombectomy remains uncertain.
Cohort (n=698)
Yes
Odds Ratio: 0.98 (95% CI 0.74–1.29)
Absolute Event Rate: 3% vs 3%
p-value: p=0.881
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Rapid therapeutic decisions in acute stroke patients leading to earlier initiation of revascularization therapies are associated with better outcome. An association between regular working hours and reduced time to initiation of intravenous thrombolysis has been reported. However, its influence on mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains uncertain. We aimed to analyze the effects of admission time on door-to-groin time and stroke outcome in a large prospective stroke registry of the Neurovascular Net Ruhr in Germany. METHODS: Procedural times of a total of 512 patients treated with MT were analyzed. Admission to hospital during regular working days and hours (Monday to Friday, 8 am to 4 pm) was compared with admission outside these times. Door-to-groin time and the difference in NIH Stroke Scale between admission and discharge served as primary outcome parameters. Long-term functional outcome was centrally assessed with modified Rankin scale. RESULTS: = 0.002). Favorable long-term outcome did not differ between both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment outside regular working hours caused a significant delay in the initiation of MT, which was associated with a decreased short-term clinical efficacy of thrombectomy. Strategies like compulsory attendance of the interventional neuroradiologist at the hospital 24/7 might result in shorter door-to-groin times and consecutive in better stroke outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoepner et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Acute ischemic stroke with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (n=698). Off-hour presentation vs. On-hour presentation was evaluated on 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (shift analysis) (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.29, p=0.881). In patients with acute ischemic stroke and anterior circulation large vessel occlusion, off-hour presentation for endovascular treatment did not significantly impact the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score compared to on-hour presentation (OR 0.98).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: