Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The ambiguity and multivocality of silence in empirical studies invite methodological examinations for better theorization. In this paper, we aim to expand the understandings of silence by considering its place in qualitative research praxis. We propose sensitizing approaches that are more attuned to non-verbal, affective registers of conveyance. This methodological imperative involves listening to silence through contextualization and reflexive research practices. Furthermore, we note that silence can be an absent presence that rejects the researcher’s gaze, underscoring the ethical and epistemic risks in interpreting silence. Ultimately, we highlight the complexity of silence and the dilemma of encountering silence in research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: