Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article introduces Critical Race Feminista Quantitative Ethnography (CRFQE), a methodological framework that brings together Critical Race Feminisms, epistolary praxis, Quantitative Ethnography (QE), and Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) in an intentional conversation. Engaging an epistolary praxis with Ida B. Wells-Barnett, the article traces how Women of Color feminist epistemologies challenge the presumed neutrality of quantitative methods and offer alternative forms of knowledge production through computational modeling. Using pláticas~testimonios from Dominican undergraduate students during the COVID-19 pandemic, the study demonstrates how ENA can visualize the epistemic structures of lived experience. Collective and individual ENA models reveal how socio-economic and academic unpreparedness, emotional trauma, familial love, community resilience and advocacy, and familial degree aspirations co-occur as interconnected conditions rather than discrete events. In writing back to Wells-Barnett, I argue that writing from the margins is imperative for Critical Race Feminista quantitative work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nichole Margarita Garcia (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: