A local-capital-geometry characterization of equality between the informed-player maxmin and concavification at every prior. The additional Lean project formalizes the criterion using the nonrevealing lower value; its README explains the relationship to the complete-information game value and the manuscript's determinacy reference. Contents. Original proof PDF and LaTeX source, a complete research archive with pinned GitHub source snapshots and existing release assets, and a provenance manifest. The archive retains available verification records, source audits, reproducibility instructions and Lean source files. Original files are preserved byte-for-byte. Status. Author-submitted preprint and accompanying research materials. GitHub submission and Zenodo deposit do not constitute independent peer review or catalogue acceptance. This deposit records the existing results and their stated scope; archival checks do not certify mathematical correctness or replace a Lean build. AI use. The hand-proof manuscript and its supporting research materials were developed with GPT Codex assistance, including proof development and AI-assisted checks, as documented in the original repository. These checks are not represented as independent human peer review. The additional Maxmin Lean development is attributed to Claude Fable 5.1; its BorelValue library is attributed to Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Fable 5.1. Source versions. maxmin-concavification-characterization — 448392472b35ef2303148f78fbbd819147bab774 maxmin-concavification-lean-20261011 — 66e4210bc876a338361f97dfdd041b9a81747794 Rights. CC BY 4.0 applies to the author-controlled materials that did not already carry a license. Existing file-level licenses, copyright notices and third-party attributions remain in force. Original manuscript and repository files have not been edited for this deposit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ji Ho Bae (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: