This paper presents the formal mathematical foundations and unified synthesis of the Local Interaction Field Equilibrium (LIFE) framework. By expanding Minkowski’s four-dimensional spacetime continuum into a unified volumetric force-density equilibrium (∑ B_i ≡ 0 N/m³), we resolve several longstanding paradoxes in classical electrodynamics, quantum foundations, and elementary particle physics.Through standing-wave envelope regularization coupled to an intrinsic gravito-inertial mass-energy term (Term B-6), elementary leptons and hadrons—such as the electron and proton—are substantiated not as point-charge singularities, but as self-binding, three-dimensional electromagnetic cavity eigenmodes. This framework naturally eliminates the infinite electrostatic self-energy divergence (∫ E² dV → ∞) and Poincaré self-stresses without requiring ad-hoc non-electrical hypotheses. The 1836:1 mass disparity between the proton (938.27 MeV) and electron (0.511 MeV) is resolved via geometric cavity compaction: because the proton encapsulates a vastly higher energy density, non-linear gravito-inertial self-compression forces it into an ultra-compact femtometer cavity (R₀ ≈ 0.8 fm), whereas the electron occupies an extended picometer enclosure (R₀ ≈ 1.21 pm).Furthermore, complete three-dimensional quantization yields a parameter-free mass spectrum governed by spherical Bessel roots (xn,l/π) that accurately predicts baryonic excitations (including the spin-flip Δ(1232) and the radial breathing Roper N(1440) resonances) and resolves the Standard Model Yukawa hierarchy problem (y_f ∝ 1/R₀). Finally, the formation of the ground-state hydrogen atom is derived as a stationary cavity equilibrium: destructive field interference in the intermediate shell induces an effective metric-inertial repulsive gradient that permanently stabilizes the electron envelope at the Bohr radius (a₀ ≈ 52.9 pm), providing a deterministic alternative to classical radiation collapse and unphysical quantum jump postulates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wim Vegt (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: