Why the study?
The attention to acute coronary syndromes in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection requires assessment of the risk associated with high CO-RADS scores on chest CT.
Cross-Sectional (n=100)
No
Odds Ratio: 13.33 (95% CI 1.321–134.62)
Absolute Event Rate: 90.9% vs 42.9%
p-value: p=0.028
Background: COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) is another initiative for standardization, published in mid-March of 2020, which differs from the RSNA's approach as it is based in previous efforts such as Lung-RADS, PI-RADS, and BI-RADS, which grades the findings on how likely the diagnosis of COVID-19 is.Also, the attention of the clinician to acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in a patient with a background of SARS-CoV-2 infection, in addition to classic risk factors, should be aimed at assessing the mechanisms involved in the development of Type 2 myocardial infarction (MI) as well as the presence of vasospasm.Aim and Objectives: To determine the risk of cardiac insults in patients with high CORADS detected in C.T chest.Subjects and Methods: This study was conducted on 100 patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome referred to Tanta University Hospitals, Cardiovascular Department within 6 months starting from November 2021.Result: Our results, positive respiratory symptoms and CO-RADS were significantly associated with the incidence of STEMI and NSTEMI.So, the risk of cardiac insults increases in patients with high CORADS detected in C.T chest.Conclusion: We conclude that positive respiratory symptoms and CO-RADS were significantly associated with the incidence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS).So, the risk of cardiac insults increases in patients with high CORADS detected in C.T chest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2023 study conducted a cross-sectional in Acute Coronary Syndrome (n=100). High CO-RADS score (CO-RADS 5) vs. CO-RADS 1 (normal or non-infectious) was evaluated on Incidence of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) (OR 13.33, 95% CI 1.321-134.62, p=0.028).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: