We are investigating the use of a retro-reflective tape (3M Industries), which reflects light along a line parallel to the incident light, as a substitute for Teflon tape or other reflective material used with scintillation crystals. We expect this retro-reflective property to improve the spatial resolution in large continuous crystals relative to that seen with Teflon, or other reflective coatings, when the reflective tape is coupled to the front (radiation incident) side of the crystal. Three CsI(TI) crystals of dimensions 5.8 cm /spl times/ 5.6 cm /spl times/ 5 mm, 6 cm /spl times/ 6 cm /spl times/ 12 mm, and 6 cm /spl times/ 6 cm /spl times/ 20 mm were evaluated by stepping a collimated /sup 99m/Tc source across the crystal face. Images were taken with the crystal coupled to a position-sensitive photomultiplier tube. The energy resolution and signal amplitude were similar for both the reflector and Teflon. The average spatial resolution in the central region of the 5-mm-thick crystal with black sides was measured to be 3.6 /spl plusmn/ 0.3 mm and 5.0 /spl plusmn/ 0.3 mm for retro-reflective tape and Teflon tape, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McElroy et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: