Key result
Borderline latent RHD progresses in ~14% of youth, while nearly half regress.
Why the study?
The natural history of borderline and mild-definite latent rheumatic heart disease in children and youth diagnosed before age 25 years is variable and incompletely characterized globally.
Meta-Analysis (n=1,618)
Yes
A substantial proportion of children and youth with borderline (49%) and mild-definite (34%) latent rheumatic heart disease exhibit natural echocardiographic regression over time, highlighting disease variability and the need for personalized prophylaxis strategies.
Variable natural history of latent RHD may favor selective prophylaxis; leaves open optimal strategies pending randomized trials.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate progression, regression and persistence rates for borderline and mild-definite latent RHD in children and youth diagnosed at age < 25 years. METHODS: A review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Electronic databases were searched for latent RHD echocardiography follow-up studies which used World Heart Federation diagnostic criteria. A meta-analysis of outcomes was conducted for borderline and mild-definite disease subcategories. RESULTS: Data for 1618 individuals from 12 studies were included. For borderline cases, 48.51% regressed (95%CI 45.10-51.93), 13.99% progressed (95%CI 9.72-18.25), and 38.61% had persistent (unchanged) disease at follow-up (95%CI 29.68-47.54). For mild-definite cases, 34.01% regressed (95%CI 28.88-39.15), 8.06% progressed (95%CI 3.65-16.90), and 60.23% had persistent disease (95%CI 55.08-67.38). CONCLUSIONS: Borderline and mild-definite latent RHD show variable evolution following initial diagnosis. While 8% of mild-definite and 14% borderline cases had signs of disease progression at follow-up, a third of mild-definite and half of borderline cases had disease regression, even with sub adequate antibiotic prophylaxis. The significant variability between study cohorts suggests latent RHD natural history is likely variable between different endemic regions globally. Future research is needed to identify those individuals who would most benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis and determine regional natural history of latent RHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Francia et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Latent rheumatic heart disease (n=1,618). Latent rheumatic heart disease (borderline and mild-definite) vs. Unexposed controls or none was evaluated on Disease progression at follow-up for borderline cases (95% CI 9.72-18.25). Borderline and mild-definite latent rheumatic heart disease progressed in 13.99% and 8.06% of affected children and youth at follow-up, respectively, while 48.51% of borderline and 34.01% of mild-definite cases demonstrated disease regression.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: