Key result
Inflammatory-cardiorenal-nutritional vulnerability phenotype linked to ~97% higher odds of 30-day unplanned readmission.
Why the study?
Conventional LVEF-based classification may not fully capture systemic inflammatory, nutritional, hematologic, and cardiorenal abnormalities in heart failure patients, motivating identification of laboratory-derived inflammatory–nutritional phenogroups and their clinical associations.
Does laboratory-derived inflammatory-nutritional phenogrouping predict severe functional limitation and 30-day same-center all-cause unplanned readmission in hospitalized patients with heart failure?
Cohort (n=1,588)
No
Does laboratory-derived inflammatory-nutritional phenogrouping predict severe functional limitation and 30-day same-center all-cause unplanned readmission in hospitalized patients with heart failure?
Odds Ratio: 1.966 (95% CI 1.364–2.835)
Absolute Event Rate: 16.7% vs 9.1%
p-value: p=<0.001
Routine laboratory data can identify distinct inflammatory-nutritional heart failure phenotypes that independently predict severe functional limitation and 30-day unplanned readmission.
May support phenogroup-based readmission risk stratification in heart failure; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background Heart failure (HF) is characterized by marked clinical heterogeneity, while conventional left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)-based classification may not fully capture systemic inflammatory, nutritional, hematologic, and cardiorenal abnormalities. We aimed to identify laboratory-derived inflammatory–nutritional exploratory phenogroups in hospitalized patients with HF and evaluate their associations with functional limitation and 30-day same-center all-cause unplanned readmission. Methods This single-center retrospective cohort included 1,588 hospitalized patients with HF, of whom 1,455 with complete data for 15 prespecified clustering variables were included in the primary analysis. K-means, Gaussian mixture models, and DBSCAN were compared, and K-means with K = 3 was selected based on internal separation, stability, cluster size, and clinical interpretability, with K = 2 used as a sensitivity analysis. Severe functional limitation was defined as NYHA class III–IV, and 30-day same-center all-cause unplanned readmission was evaluated as the short-term clinical outcome. Multivariable logistic regression with HC3 robust standard errors was used to assess these associations, with multiple-imputation and median-imputation sensitivity analyses conducted in the full cohort. Results Three phenogroups were identified: an inflammatory–cardiorenal–nutritional vulnerability phenotype, an anemia–immune dysregulation phenotype, and a relatively preserved laboratory phenotype. LVEF was similar across groups, whereas severe functional limitation and 30-day same-center all-cause unplanned readmission differed significantly. After enhanced adjustment, compared with Cluster 3, the odds ratios for severe functional limitation were 3.814 and 5.594 for Clusters 1 and 2, respectively, and the corresponding odds ratios for 30-day same-center all-cause unplanned readmission were 1.966 and 2.616. Higher quartiles of both ALI and PNI were associated with lower odds of severe functional limitation; higher ALI quartiles and the highest PNI quartile were associated with lower odds of 30-day same-center all-cause unplanned readmission. Conclusion Routine admission laboratory measurements identified three exploratory HF phenogroups with distinct inflammatory, nutritional, hematologic, and cardiorenal profiles. After adjustment for continuous LVEF and NT-proBNP, the two vulnerable phenogroups remained associated with severe functional limitation and 30-day same-center all-cause unplanned readmission, with directionally consistent findings in the full-cohort and K = 2 sensitivity analyses. ALI and PNI reflect laboratory-derived inflammatory–nutritional vulnerability but cannot replace formal nutritional assessment or establish incremental predictive value. These findings remain exploratory and require validation in prospective multicenter cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=1,588). Inflammatory-cardiorenal-nutritional vulnerability phenotype (Cluster 1) vs. Relatively preserved laboratory phenotype (Cluster 3) was evaluated on 30-day same-center all-cause unplanned readmission (OR 1.966, 95% CI 1.364-2.835, p=<0.001). Compared with a relatively preserved laboratory phenotype, an inflammatory-cardiorenal-nutritional vulnerability phenotype was associated with increased odds of 30-day unplanned readmission (OR 1.966).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: