Key result
Prehospital ultrasound aids in identifying reversible causes and distinguishing pseudo-PEA during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Why the study?
The increasing proportion of OHCAs with PEA as initial rhythm poses challenges in identifying underlying causes in the prehospital setting with limited resources.
Systematic Review
May inform prehospital PEA protocols; leaves open prospective trials on ultrasound feasibility and survival.
The proportion of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) with pulseless electrical activity (PEA) as initial rhythm is increasing. PEA should be managed by identifying the underlying cause of the arrest and treating it accordingly. This often poses a challenge in the chaotic prehospital environment with only limited resources available. The aim of this study was to review the diagnostic tools available in a prehospital setting, and their interpretation during cardiac arrest (CA) with PEA as initial rhythm. A systematic literature search of the PubMed database was performed. Articles were assessed for eligibility by title, abstract, and full text. Ultrasonography has become a great asset in detecting underlying causes, and a variety of protocols have been proposed. There are currently no studies comparing these protocols regarding their feasibility and their effect on patient survival. Further research concerning the relationship between electrocardiogram characteristics and underlying causes is required. Limited evidence suggests a role for point-of-care testing in detecting hyperkalemia and a role for capnography in the diagnosis of asphyxia CA. Multiple studies describe a prognostic potential. Although evidence about the prognostic potential of cerebral oximetry in OHCA is accumulating, its diagnostic potential is still unknown. In the management of OHCA, anamnestic and clinical information remains the initial source of information in search for an underlying cause. Ultrasonographic evaluation should be performed subsequently, both for detecting an underlying cause and discriminating between true PEA and pseudo PEA. Comparative studies are required to identify the best ultrasonographic protocol, which can be included in resuscitation guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bempt et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review in Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity. Prehospital diagnostic tools (ultrasonography, ECG, capnography, cerebral oximetry, point-of-care testing) was evaluated. Prehospital diagnostic tools, particularly ultrasonography, play a vital role in detecting the underlying reversible causes of pulseless electrical activity and discriminating between true and pseudo-PEA during out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: