Key result
Prehospital ROSC is linked to ~23-fold higher odds of favourable 1-month neurological recovery in PEA OHCA.
Why the study?
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity has a poor prognosis and heterogeneous aetiology, necessitating identification of prehospital predictors of favourable outcomes.
What are the prehospital predictors of a favourable neurological outcome in adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest presenting with pulseless electrical activity?
Cohort (n=442,630)
Yes
What are the prehospital predictors of a favourable neurological outcome in adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest presenting with pulseless electrical activity?
Relative Risk: 23.31
Prehospital factors, particularly return of spontaneous circulation and witnessed arrest, strongly predict 1-month favourable neurological outcomes in PEA out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, with prognostic implications varying by cardiac versus non-cardiac aetiology.
Prehospital ROSC may inform prognosis in PEA OHCA; leaves open whether etiology-specific interventions improve outcomes in this observational cohort.
Background Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with pulseless electrical activity (PEA) has a poor prognosis and is aetiologically heterogeneous. We aimed to identify prehospital predictors of a favourable outcome, overall and by presumed aetiology. Methods This nationwide cohort study analysed 442,630 adults with OHCA and an initial rhythm of PEA from the All-Japan Utstein Registry between 2005 and 2024. The primary outcome was a favourable neurological outcome at 1 month. Two models were fitted, at the scene and at hospital arrival, each also within each aetiology. Epinephrine and advanced airway management (AAM) were assessed by time-dependent propensity score sequential matching. Results At the scene, a witnessed arrest (risk ratio [RR], 1.65) predicted a favourable neurological outcome, and a longer response time predicted a worse one (RR, 0.66; 10 versus 5 min. The gradient with age was steeper in cardiac than non-cardiac PEA (RR, 0.38 versus 0.78). At hospital arrival, prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (RR, 23.31) was the strongest predictor, but conversion to a shockable rhythm predicted a favourable outcome only in cardiac PEA and a worse outcome in non-cardiac PEA (RR, 1.37 versus 0.73). Standardised to a common covariate distribution, 1-month survival was higher in non-cardiac PEA, whereas a favourable neurological outcome was more likely in cardiac PEA. After time-dependent adjustment, the apparent harm from epinephrine and AAM was attenuated. Conclusions Prehospital information available before hospital arrival predicted a favourable neurological outcome, but its prognostic meaning depended on the presumed aetiology. These independent prehospital predictors could inform future risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kosugi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity (n=442,630). Prehospital predictors (e.g., prehospital return of spontaneous circulation) vs. Absence of predictors was evaluated on Favourable neurological outcome at 1 month (RR 23.31). Prehospital return of spontaneous circulation was the strongest predictor of a favourable neurological outcome at 1 month (RR 23.31) in adults with OHCA and an initial rhythm of PEA.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: