This study investigates the dynamic response and multi-field damage evolution of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) composite laminates subjected to blast-fragment-coupled loading. The aim is to elucidate the ambiguous failure mechanisms and address the challenging performance-weight trade-off associated with traditional protective materials. A high-fidelity finite element (FE) model was developed by incorporating air, prefabricated fragment arrays, and a composite target to simulate shock wave propagation, fragment dispersion and penetration, and progressive laminate failure. This was achieved using a multimaterial arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) algorithm in conjunction with penalty-based fluid-structure interaction (FSI) technology. Anisotropic damage and interlayer delamination were characterized using the Chang–Chang criterion and tie-break contact model, respectively. The model was validated through mesh convergence and experiments, maintaining the relative errors of the key mechanical indicators within 10%. Parametric analysis indicated that the target damage was primarily influenced by the synergistic effect of blast-induced global bending and fragment-induced local perforations. The standoff distance was found to govern the overpressure attenuation, following the inverse cube law in air, with an optimal single-fragment mass of 0.975 g. A critical laminate thickness of 1.0 cm was identified, beyond which the protection efficiency increased at a lower rate. Fragment clusters were observed to act as secondary shock sources, thereby reducing the peak over-pressures. A multidimensional synergistic protection mechanism was identified, and the optimized S+U+S sandwich structure achieved a 50% weight reduction compared to steel structures with equivalent protection. This study provides theoretical and quantitative design guidelines for UHMWPE composites in protection engineering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: