Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a significant component of the contemporary globalised world, influencing education, communication, employment, and daily social interactions. Its growing presence in higher education is transforming how students gather information, complete academic tasks, communicate with others, and prepare for their careers. This article analyses the impact of AI on students' attitudes, socialisation, and professional perspectives, particularly within the Indian context. The study employs a qualitative methodology based on secondary data, using peer-reviewed research, systematic reviews, government policy documents, and reports from recognised national and international institutions. The analysis shows that while students generally acknowledge AI's educational value, factors such as institutional support, perceived benefits, ethical concerns, and trust in AI-generated information shape their attitudes. Although AI can facilitate learning and collaborative educational activities, overreliance on it—at the expense of human interaction—may raise concerns about social engagement and interpersonal relationships. Regarding employment, AI is simultaneously transforming existing professions, creating new job opportunities, and altering the skill sets expected of graduates. According to the World Economic Forum, the transformation of the labour market by 2030 could lead to the creation of 170 million new jobs and the displacement of 90 million, resulting in a net increase of 78 million jobs. India is addressing these changes through initiatives such as the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, India AI FutureSkills, and NITI Aayog’s roadmap for job creation in the AI economy. The article represents the acceptance of a human-oriented model for mixing AI into Indian higher education—one that coordinates technical expertise with critical thinking, academic honesty, social involvement, employability, and moral accountability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saiki Das (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: