Key result
Empagliflozin cuts 3-point MACE risk ~32% vs. placebo in Asian patients with T2D and CVD.
Why the study?
The effects of empagliflozin on cardiovascular outcomes in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease were not previously reported separately from the overall trial population.
RCT (n=1,517)
Randomized
Yes
Hazard Ratio: 0.68 (95% CI 0.48–0.95)
Absolute Event Rate: 7.9% vs 11.4%
p-value: p=0.0872 for treatment by race interaction
Consistent CV benefits in Asian T2DM patients; extends overall trial findings but leaves open dedicated confirmation.
BACKGROUND: trial, empagliflozin added to standard of care reduced the risk of 3-point major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events (3-point MACE: composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke) by 14%, CV death by 38%, hospitalization for heart failure by 35%, and all-cause mortality by 32% in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and established CV disease. We investigated the effects of empagliflozin in patients of Asian race. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were randomized to receive empagliflozin 10 mg, empagliflozin 25 mg, or placebo. Of 7,020 patients treated, 1,517 (21.6%) were of Asian race. The reduction in 3-point MACE in Asian patients was consistent with the overall population: 3-point MACE occurred in 79/1,006 patients (7.9%) in the pooled empagliflozin group vs. 58/511 patients (11.4%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio: 0.68 [95% confidence interval: 0.48-0.95], P-value for treatment by race interaction (Asian, White, Black/African-American): 0.0872). The effects of empagliflozin on the components of MACE, all-cause mortality, and heart failure outcomes in Asian patients were consistent with the overall population (P-values for interaction by race >0.05). The adverse event profile of empagliflozin in Asian patients was similar to the overall trial population. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in the risk of CV outcomes and mortality with empagliflozin in Asian patients with T2DM and established CV disease were consistent with the overall trial population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaku et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease (n=1,517). Empagliflozin vs. Placebo was evaluated on 3-point MACE (composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke) (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.95, p=0.0872 for treatment by race interaction). Empagliflozin reduced the risk of 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events by 32% (HR 0.68) compared to placebo in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: