Key result
Continuous vutrisiran cuts all-cause hospitalizations ~29% vs delayed treatment in ATTR-CM.
Why the study?
The long-term impact of vutrisiran on hospitalizations and urgent heart failure visits in patients with transthyretin amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy was not reported.
Does continuous vutrisiran reduce hospitalizations and urgent heart failure visits compared to delayed treatment in patients with ATTR-CM?
RCT (n=654)
Open-label
Randomized (during the initial double-blind phase)
Does continuous vutrisiran reduce hospitalizations and urgent heart failure visits compared to delayed treatment in patients with ATTR-CM?
Relative Risk: 0.71 (95% CI 0.62–0.82)
p-value: p=<0.001
Continuous vutrisiran initiated earlier in ATTR-CM patients significantly reduces long-term all-cause and cardiovascular hospitalizations compared to delayed treatment.
May support continued vutrisiran to reduce HF events in ATTR-CM; extends double-blind data but leaves open durability in longer trials.
BACKGROUND: Vutrisiran significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality and recurrent cardiovascular (CV) events vs placebo in patients with transthyretin amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) in the phase 3 HELIOS-B study (NCT04153149). Here, we report the long-term impact of vutrisiran on hospitalizations and urgent heart failure (HF) visits from the ongoing HELIOS-B open-label extension (OLE). METHODS: In HELIOS-B, patients received vutrisiran 25 mg or placebo every 3 months over a 33-36-month double-blind period, followed by a 24-month OLE continuing with vutrisiran (continuous treatment), or if previously receiving placebo, initiating vutrisiran (delayed treatment). Hospitalizations and urgent HF visits were analyzed through 48 months (12 months of the OLE) in the overall and monotherapy (not receiving tafamidis at baseline) populations, and the baseline tafamidis subgroup. RESULTS: Of 654 participants, 466 entered the OLE. Continuous vutrisiran reduced the risk of all-cause hospitalizations vs delayed treatment in the overall population (relative rate ratio [RRR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.82, P<0.001) and the monotherapy population (RRR 0.60, 95% CI 0.50-0.72, P<0.001). Continuous vutrisiran also significantly reduced the risk of CV hospitalizations, HF hospitalizations, and non-CV hospitalizations vs delayed vutrisiran in the overall and monotherapy populations, and urgent HF visits in the overall population and baseline tafamidis subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous vutrisiran reduced the risk of CV events and hospitalizations relative to patients originally randomized to placebo in HELIOS-B. Many treatment effects were of greater magnitude at 48 months vs 36 months with continuous vutrisiran, highlighting the benefits of earlier diagnosis and treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cuddy et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Transthyretin amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) (n=654). Vutrisiran (Continuous treatment) vs. Delayed vutrisiran (originally placebo) was evaluated on All-cause hospitalizations in the overall population (RRR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62-0.82, p=<0.001). Continuous vutrisiran reduced the risk of all-cause hospitalizations compared to delayed treatment in patients with ATTR-CM (RRR 0.71; 95% CI 0.62-0.82; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: