Key result
Only ~19% of AF outpatients on warfarin achieve target time in therapeutic range.
Why the study?
Achieving adequate anticoagulation with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation requires appropriate prescribing, individualized dose adjustment, and regular monitoring, but the extent of these practices and TTR achievement was unclear at this center.
Observational (n=106)
No
Despite high appropriateness in prescribing indications, warfarin anticoagulation control in this Indonesian cohort was highly suboptimal, highlighting the need for individualized dose adjustment and timely INR monitoring.
Warfarin remains an important oral anticoagulant for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); however, achieving adequate anticoagulation requires appropriate prescribing, individualized dose adjustment, and regular monitoring. This study evaluated warfarin utilization, drug-related problems, and achievement of target time in therapeutic range (TTR) among patients with AF at the Integrated Cardiac Care Center Outpatient Clinic of Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia. This retrospective observational study reviewed the medical records of 106 eligible patients who attended the clinic between December 2023 and January 2024. Warfarin indications, dosing practices, international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring intervals, potential drug–drug interactions, and suspected adverse drug reactions were evaluated. TTR was calculated using the Rosendaal linear interpolation method. Appropriate indications for warfarin therapy were identified in 83.96% of patients. Mean concordance with the warfarin dosing algorithm was 43.20%, while 35.48% of 885 INR monitoring events occurred within the recommended monitoring intervals. Sixty-five potential drug–drug interaction events and nine bleeding events classified as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 were documented. The mean TTR was 43.15 ± 25.28%, and only 18.87% of patients achieved a TTR ≥65%. These findings indicate that appropriate indications for warfarin therapy did not consistently correspond to adequate anticoagulation control. Warfarin management should therefore emphasize individualized dose adjustment, timely INR monitoring, and systematic medication review. These findings provide a basis for improving anticoagulation management services; however, the retrospective observational design precludes causal inference.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Novinta et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Atrial Fibrillation (n=106). Warfarin therapy was evaluated on Achievement of target Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) ≥65%. Among outpatients with atrial fibrillation receiving maintenance warfarin therapy, the mean time in therapeutic range was 43.15%, with only 18.87% of patients achieving the target TTR of ≥65%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: