This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The Muse 2 EEG headset also records forehead photoplethysmography (PPG). We tested whether its pulse intervals can replace Polar H10 RR intervals for ultra-short heart-rate variability in 28 seated recordings (60 s eyes open, then 60 s eyes closed), using fixed processing, no exclusions and eleven sensitivity analyses. Mean heart rate agreed almost perfectly (ICC ≥ 0.999; bias −0.22 and 0.00 beats min−1). SDNN agreement was good to excellent (ICC 0.86 and 0.91; bias +8.6 and +8.2 ms). RMSSD agreement was moderate (ICC 0.60): Muse exceeded Polar in at least 27 of 28 sessions (bias +19.2 and +18.5 ms; about 1.9-fold), and the ratio bias fell as RMSSD rose. Interval differences (SD 23 ms) implied about 16 ms of independent timing error per pulse, which reproduced the RMSSD bias; without ECG, sensor jitter could not be separated from variation in pulse transit time. Tracking of the eyes-closed change in ln RMSSD was not demonstrated (ρ = 0.35, 95% CI −0.07 to 0.67; detectable ρ ≥ 0.51). Muse 2 PPG can supply mean heart rate and, with a stated bias, SDNN; its ultra-short RMSSD is not interchangeable with Polar RMSSD and should be reported as pulse-rate variability.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Griadhi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: