Key result
Enhanced chemosensitivity to hypoxia and hypercapnia is linked to ~51% lower 4-year survival in HFrEF.
Why the study?
The prognostic value of enhanced chemosensitivity to hypercapnia in systolic heart failure had not been specifically evaluated.
Does enhanced chemosensitivity to hypoxia and hypercapnia predict the composite of cardiac death and aborted cardiac death in patients with systolic heart failure?
Cohort (n=110)
Does enhanced chemosensitivity to hypoxia and hypercapnia predict the composite of cardiac death and aborted cardiac death in patients with systolic heart failure?
Combined increased chemosensitivity to hypoxia and hypercapnia is a strong, independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with systolic heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Combined chemosensitivity testing may aid risk stratification in systolic HF; leaves open whether it guides therapy or requires prospective validation.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic significance of chemosensitivity to hypercapnia in chronic heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: Increased chemosensitivity to hypoxia and hypercapnia has been observed in HF. The potential value of enhanced chemosensitivity to hypercapnia to risk prediction in systolic HF has not been specifically evaluated. METHODS: One hundred ten consecutive systolic HF patients (age 62 +/- 15 years, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 31 +/- 7%) underwent assessment of chemosensitivity to hypoxia and hypercapnia (rebreathing technique) and were followed up for a median period of 29 months (range 1 to 54 months). The end point was a composite of cardiac death and aborted cardiac death (ventricular tachyarrhythmia treated by cardioverter-defibrillator). RESULTS: At baseline, 31 patients (28%) had enhanced chemosensitivity to both hypoxia and hypercapnia. Although they had the same LVEF as the 43 patients (39%) with normal chemosensitivity, they were more symptomatic (New York Heart Association functional class), had higher plasma brain natriuretic peptide and norepinephrine, steeper regression slope relating minute ventilation to carbon dioxide output (V(E)/V(CO2) slope), more Cheyne-Stokes respiration, and more ventricular arrhythmias (all p < 0.05). Four-year survival was only 49%, in marked contrast to 100% for patients with normal chemosensitivity (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, combined elevation in chemosensitivity was the strongest independent prognostic marker, even when adjusted for univariate predictors (V(E)/V(CO2) slope, Cheyne-Stokes respiration, LVEF, and brain natriuretic peptide, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Increased chemosensitivity to both hypoxia and hypercapnia, eliciting neurohormonal derangement, ventilation instability, and ventricular arrhythmias, is a very serious adverse prognostic marker in HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giannoni et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in Systolic heart failure (n=110). Enhanced chemosensitivity to hypoxia and hypercapnia vs. Normal chemosensitivity was evaluated on Composite of cardiac death and aborted cardiac death (ventricular tachyarrhythmia treated by cardioverter-defibrillator) (p=<0.001). In systolic heart failure, combined enhanced chemosensitivity to hypoxia and hypercapnia was associated with 49% four-year survival versus 100% for normal chemosensitivity (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: