Key result
Left atrial appendage closure is an effective stroke prevention strategy in atrial fibrillation, though unresolved issues remain regarding optimal patient selection and complication management.
Why the study?
There are unresolved issues regarding optimal patient and device selection and management of complications in left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.
Does left atrial appendage (LAA) closure safely and effectively prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does left atrial appendage (LAA) closure safely and effectively prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Left atrial appendage closure is an effective strategy for stroke prevention in AF, though challenges remain regarding patient and device selection, as well as management of periprocedural complications.
Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure has evolved as an effective strategy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation who are considered suitable for oral anticoagulation. There is strong evidence based on randomized clinical trials with 1 percutaneous device, as well as a large registry experience with several devices, regarding the safety and efficacy of this strategy. In addition, there is encouraging data regarding the effect of epicardial LAA closure on decreasing arrhythmia burden and improvements in systemic homeostasis by neurohormonal modulation. However, there are several unresolved issues regarding optimal patient selection, device selection, management of periprocedural complications including device-related thrombus, residual leaks, and pericarditis. In this review, we summarize the rationale, evidence, optimal patient selection, and common challenges encountered with mechanical LAA exclusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Turagam et al. (2018) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure was evaluated. Left atrial appendage closure is an effective stroke prevention strategy in atrial fibrillation, though unresolved issues remain regarding optimal patient selection and complication management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: