Key result
Drug-eluting stents show similar 30-day stent thrombosis rates compared to bare-metal stents.
Why the study?
Current data on stent thrombosis in drug-eluting stents come from randomized trials with strict entry criteria, limiting generalizability to daily practice.
Does the unrestricted real-world use of sirolimus-eluting or paclitaxel-eluting stents increase the risk of 30-day stent thrombosis compared to bare-metal stents?
Cohort (n=2,512)
Does the unrestricted real-world use of sirolimus-eluting or paclitaxel-eluting stents increase the risk of 30-day stent thrombosis compared to bare-metal stents?
In unrestricted real-world practice, sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents demonstrate similar 30-day stent thrombosis rates (~1%) to bare-metal stents, with bifurcation stenting during acute MI identified as a major independent risk factor.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the real-world incidence of angiographically confirmed and possible stent thrombosis (ST) in an unrestricted population during the first 30 days after bare-metal stent (BMS), sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) implantation. BACKGROUND: Current data on ST in drug-eluting stents (DES) have come from randomized trials with strict entry criteria, which limits their generalizability to daily practice. METHODS: The study population comprised three sequential cohorts of 506 consecutive patients with BMS, 1,017 consecutive patients with SES, and 989 consecutive patients treated with PES. RESULTS: In the first 30 days after stent implantation, 6 BMS (1.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5% to 2.6%; p = 0.9), 10 SES (1.0%, 95% CI 0.5% to 1.8%), and 10 PES (1.0%, 95% CI 0.6% to 1.9%) patients developed angiographically proven ST. Multiple potential risk factors were identified in most patients with ST. Bifurcation stenting in the setting of acute myocardial infarction was an independent risk factor for angiographic ST in the entire population (odds ratio [OR] 12.9, 95% CI 4.7 to 35.8, p < 0.001). In patients with DES who had angiographic ST, 30-day mortality was 15%, whereas another 60% suffered a nonfatal myocardial infarction; no further deaths occurred during six months of follow-up. Including possible cases, 7 BMS (1.4%, 95% CI 0.7% to 2.8%), 15 SES (1.5%, 95% CI 0.9% to 2.4%), and 16 PES (1.6%, 95% CI 1.0% to 2.6%) patients had ST. CONCLUSIONS: The unrestricted use of SES or PES is associated with ST rates in the range expected for BMS. Stent thrombosis was associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Bifurcation stenting, when performed in patients with acute myocardial infarction, was associated with an increased risk of ST.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ong et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease requiring stent implantation (n=2,512). Sirolimus-eluting or paclitaxel-eluting stents vs. Bare-metal stents (BMS) was evaluated on Angiographically proven stent thrombosis at 30 days (p=0.9). In a real-world population, 30-day rates of angiographically proven stent thrombosis were similar following implantation of sirolimus (1.0%), paclitaxel (1.0%), or bare-metal stents (1.2%; p=0.9).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: