Key result
Prodromal angina linked to ~6-point lower in-hospital mortality in AMI, but only without diabetes.
Why the study?
The impact of diabetes on ischemic preconditioning and the beneficial effects of prodromal angina in acute myocardial infarction patients was unclear.
Does prodromal angina (ischemic preconditioning) reduce infarct size and improve survival in diabetic patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=611)
Does prodromal angina (ischemic preconditioning) reduce infarct size and improve survival in diabetic patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.4% vs 9.3%
p-value: p=0.015
Diabetes appears to abolish the cardioprotective effects of ischemic preconditioning (prodromal angina) on infarct size and in-hospital survival in patients presenting with acute anterior myocardial infarction.
OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to assess whether prodromal angina could have beneficial effects in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Prodromal angina occurring shortly before the onset of AMI is associated with favorable outcomes by the mechanism of ischemic preconditioning. However, little is known about the impact of diabetes on ischemic preconditioning. METHODS: We studied 611 patients with a first anterior wall AMI who underwent emergency catheterization within 12 h after the onset of chest pain: 490 patients without diabetes and 121 patients with non-insulin treated diabetes. Prodromal angina was defined as angina episode(s) occurring within 24 h before the onset of AMI. Serial contrast left ventriculograms were obtained in 424 patients at the time of acute and predischarge catheterization. RESULTS: In non-diabetic patients, prodromal angina was associated with lower peak creatine kinase (CK) value (3,068 +/- 2,647 IU/l vs. 3,601 +/- 2,462 IU/l, p = 0.037), larger increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (10.1 +/- 13.0% vs. 5.8 +/- 13.4%, p = 0.004) and lower in-hospital mortality (3.4% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.015). On the contrary, in diabetic patients, there was no significant difference in peak CK value (3,382 +/- 2,520 IU/l vs. 3,233 +/- 2,412 IU/l, p = NS), the change in LVEF (6.7 +/- 13.8% vs. 7.1 +/- 12.4%, p = NS) and in-hospital mortality (8.8% vs. 11.0%, p = NS) between patients with and patients without prodromal angina. CONCLUSIONS: Prodromal angina limited infarct size, enhanced recovery of LV function and improved survival in non-diabetic patients with AMI. However, such beneficial effects of prodromal angina were not observed in diabetic patients, suggesting that diabetes might prevent ischemic preconditioning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ishihara et al. (2001) conducted a cohort in Acute anterior wall myocardial infarction (n=611). Prodromal angina vs. No prodromal angina was evaluated on In-hospital mortality in non-diabetic patients (p=0.015).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: