Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh harga dan kualitas produk terhadap minat beli ulang konsumen Kopi Kani di Jakarta Timur, baik secara parsial maupun simultan. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode deskriptif asosiatif. Sampel berjumlah 96 responden yang ditentukan dengan teknik purposive sampling. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner berskala Likert dan dianalisis menggunakan uji validitas, reliabilitas, asumsi klasik, regresi linear berganda, uji t, uji F, dan koefisien determinasi dengan bantuan SPSS versi 26. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa harga berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap minat beli ulang (signifikansi 0,003), demikian pula kualitas produk (signifikansi 0,002). Secara simultan, harga dan kualitas produk berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap minat beli ulang (signifikansi 0,000). Nilai Adjusted R Square sebesar 0,421 menunjukkan bahwa kedua variabel menjelaskan 42,1% variasi minat beli ulang, sedangkan 57,9% dipengaruhi faktor lain di luar penelitian. Kualitas produk memiliki kontribusi yang sedikit lebih besar dibandingkan harga.Kata kunci: harga; kualitas produk; minat beli ulang; Kopi KaniAbstractThis study aims to determine the effect of price and product quality on consumers’ repurchase intention at Kopi Kani in East Jakarta, both partially and simultaneously. A quantitative approach with an associative descriptive method was used. The sample consisted of 96 respondents selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a Likert-scale questionnaire and analyzed through validity, reliability, classical assumption, multiple linear regression, t-test, F-test, and coefficient of determination tests using SPSS version 26. The results show that price has a positive and significant effect on repurchase intention (significance 0.003), as does product quality (significance 0.002). Simultaneously, price and product quality have a positive and significant effect on repurchase intention (significance 0.000). The Adjusted R Square of 0.421 indicates that the two variables explain 42.1% of the variation in repurchase intention, while the remaining 57.9% is influenced by other factors outside this study. Product quality contributes slightly more than price.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wahidah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: