Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) is a promising therapeutic for New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (NDM-E) infections. We evaluated the performance of disk diffusion and gradient diffusion methods compared with reference broth microdilution (BMD) for ATM-AVI susceptibility testing. A total of 245 non-duplicate NDM-E isolates were included, collected from unique patients at hospitals in Chile and the United States between 2022 and 2024. Nine ATM-AVI non-susceptible isolates from a separate collection were added to enrich for resistant isolates, yielding a total of 254 isolates. Reference BMD was performed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria. ATM-AVI disk diffusion and two gradient diffusion methods (ETEST and MIC Test Strip) were evaluated against BMD using categorical agreement, essential agreement, and CLSI-defined error rates. All 245 NDM-E isolates were susceptible to ATM-AVI (MIC ≤4/4 µg/mL), with MIC₅₀/₉₀ values of 0.25/4 and 1/4 µg/mL, respectively. The collection consisted of Klebsiella pneumoniae (71%), Enterobacter cloacae complex (21%), and Escherichia coli (8%). Predominant NDM alleles included bla NDM-1 and bla NDM-7 . Disk diffusion demonstrated 98% categorical agreement (250/254), with four minor errors. Both gradient diffusion methods achieved 99% categorical agreement (252/254), with no very major or major errors and two minor errors. Essential agreement was 67% for ETEST and 85% for MIC Test Strip; both methods tended to underestimate ATM-AVI MICs relative to BMD. ATM-AVI demonstrated robust in vitro activity against a contemporary NDM-E cohort. Disk and gradient diffusion methods are practical alternatives to BMD for clinical laboratories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jimenez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: